A year after Thomas Crooks opened fire in Butler, the gunshots have long faded—but the unease, the suspicion, and the unanswered questions remain very much alive. The nation has moved on in headlines, but not in certainty. What lingers is the unsettling feeling that something about the story still doesn’t add up.
Tucker Carlson has become one of the loudest voices challenging the official narrative. Night after night, he argues that the FBI’s early assessment of Crooks—a quiet, socially withdrawn “lone wolf” with no digital trail—was not merely incomplete, but misleading. Carlson claims to have uncovered online activity suggesting violent tendencies, extremist fascination, and troubling searches that should have raised alarms. To his audience, the idea that federal investigators somehow missed or dismissed these clues doesn’t feel like incompetence—it feels intentional. A system protecting its own version of events. A government that prefers a tidy conclusion over an uncomfortable truth.
The FBI, however, pushes back with its own evidence. Officials describe an investigation massive in scale: hundreds of agents deployed, thousands of tips reviewed, every device Crooks owned seized and analyzed. They point to interviews, warrants, technical reports, and reconstructed timelines. They say they dug through his emails, his social media accounts, his encrypted apps—and found no collaborators, no signal of coordinated planning, no political manifesto, and no co-conspirators lurking in the shadows. Crooks, they insist, acted alone. They warn that the alternative—constant, pre-emptive surveillance of every citizen’s online life—would tear apart the civil liberties they are sworn to protect.
Between those two narratives sits a country deeply divided—not just over the facts, but over who they’re willing to trust. For many, the FBI’s word no longer carries the weight it once did. For others, media influencers like Carlson seem more interested in sowing doubt than uncovering truth. And in the middle of this tug-of-war is a near-assassination attempt that should have unified the nation in its aftermath but instead widened the fault lines.
A year later, America is still arguing not about what happened in Butler, but about what to believe—and who deserves to be believed at all. What should have been a moment of clarity has become another battle over narrative, credibility, and power. And as long as each side remains convinced the other is hiding something, the mystery of Thomas Crooks will continue to echo far louder than the shots he fired.
More Stories
Beloved singer dies after suffering heart attack at home
Mom who beat cancer four times shot dead in tragic accident
At My Son’s Wedding, I Was Left Sitting Alone—Until a Stranger Leaned In, Held My Hand, and Said Seven Unforgettable Words