Former White House Insider Reveals the Existence of Secretly Built Underground Cities

A former Bush administration official has ignited controversy by alleging that the U.S. government secretly built vast underground cities designed to shelter the ultra-wealthy from a future global catastrophe. According to her, trillions of taxpayer dollars didn’t simply disappear through accounting errors—they were quietly redirected into a hidden world meant to survive a coming “near-extinction event.”

Catherine Austin Fitts, who served as Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development under President George H. W. Bush, says her investigation into an estimated $21 trillion in unaccounted federal spending led her down a disturbing path. After years of reviewing government financial reports, Fitts claims she uncovered patterns suggesting massive covert construction projects beneath U.S. soil—and even under the oceans.

She describes an alleged network of underground facilities connected by advanced transportation systems, powered by what she calls “breakthrough energy technologies” that remain hidden from the public. According to Fitts, these installations were never intended to protect ordinary citizens. Instead, she claims they were built to preserve a select elite during a major planetary crisis—whether environmental, technological, or geopolitical.

Her assertions rest largely on documented financial anomalies, particularly what are known as “unsupported adjustments” within Pentagon and HUD accounting records. In one widely cited example, the U.S. Army reported trillions of dollars in adjustments in a single fiscal year that could not be adequately explained. Government auditors acknowledged the discrepancies but attributed them to poor accounting systems rather than covert activity.

Critics argue that while the missing funds are real and troubling, there is no verified evidence tying them to secret underground cities or elite survival bunkers. Large classified military projects, black-budget programs, and chronic accounting failures offer more conventional explanations. Independent experts note that the scale of construction Fitts describes would be extraordinarily difficult to conceal.

Still, the unanswered questions linger. Why has the federal government repeatedly failed comprehensive audits? Where did the money actually go? And why do so many financial records remain classified decades later?

For supporters, Fitts’ claims tap into a deeper distrust of institutions and a growing belief that powerful interests are preparing for crises the public is not being warned about. For skeptics, her conclusions stretch far beyond what the available evidence supports.

What remains indisputable is this: trillions of dollars cannot be fully accounted for, and the lack of transparency continues to fuel speculation. Whether the truth points to bureaucratic dysfunction, secret defense projects, or something more extraordinary, the silence surrounding the missing money ensures the debate isn’t ending anytime soon.